Nabi Pakﷺ ke ChaCha Hazrat Abu Talib..

Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Se Sawal Kiya Gaya Ke Aap Apne Chachaon Mein Se Kiski Kafalat Mein Rehna Pasand Karte Hein Toh Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Ne Sayyedna Abu Talib Alayhissalam Ko Pasand Farmaya.

(Madarij Un Nabuwat, Safah-24)

Jab Sayyedna Abu Talib Alayhissalam Sham Ke Safar Ke Liye Taiyar Huye Toh Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Ne Farmaya Chacha Jaan Aap Mujhe Yahan Kiske Pas Chor Kar Jaa Rahe Hein Na Toh Meri Maa Hai Aur Na He Koi Dusra Hai Jo Aapki Tarah Mujhe Apni Panah Mein Rakh Sakey Sayyedna Abu Talib Ne Rasoolullah Sallallahu Alaihi Wa Aalihi Wasallam Ki Ye Guftgu Suni Toh Tadap Gaye Aur Unpar Riqqat Taari Ho Gayi Toh Aapko Apne Saath He Sawari Par Bitha Liya Aur Sham Ki Taraf Rawana Hogaye.

(Tabaqat Ibn Saad, Safah-196)

Foster Relationship

The Quran is quite clear on this issue:

“Forbidden to you are your mothers and your daughters and your sisters and your paternal aunts and your maternal aunts and brothers’ daughters and sisters’ daughters and your mothers that have suckled you and your foster-sisters and mothers of your wives and your step-daughters who are in your guardianship, (born) of your wives to whom you have gone in, but if you have not gone in to them, there is no blame on you (in marrying them), and the wives of your sons who are of your own loins and that you should have two sisters together, except what has already passed; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.” (An-Nisa: 23)

However, there are certain conditions.

A’isha (Allah be pleased with her) reports: “Once the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) entered my house while a man was with me. He said: “O A’isha! Who is this?” I replied: “My foster-brother” He said: “O A’isha! Be careful in determining who your foster-brother is, for suckling is only valid if it takes place in the suckling period”. (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2504 & Sahih Muslim, no. 1455)

The brief answer to your question is that if your mother breastfed your cousin more than five times when she was under the age of two, then your cousin is your milk-sister and your mahram, and she is haram for you to marry.

Here are details and proofs on this issue:

For breastfeeding to have the effect of making a mahram relationship, two conditions must be met: (1) The number of breastfeeding sessions should be five or more, and (2) this should happen within the first two years of the child’s life. If these two conditions are met, then the rulings concerning breastfeeding will apply, i.e. the child will be considered a relative and marriage will be forbidden, etc.

Sheikh M. S. Al-Munajjid, a prominent Saudi Muslim lecturer and author, states:

“It is permissible for you to marry the daughter of your maternal aunt in this situation, because breastfeeding (rada`ah) only makes the woman (and her daughters) themahramsof the child who nursed if it takes place five times. [Amahramis a relative whom one is forbidden to marry and with whom the rulings of hijab or covering do not apply]. The evidence for that is the hadith narrated by Muslim from `A’ishah who said: “One of the (rulings) that was revealed in the Qur’an was that ten known sessions of breastfeeding make the child a mahram, then that was abrogated and replaced with five.”

An-Nawawi (may Allah have mercy on him) said:

The scholars differed concerning the number of sessions of breastfeeding for which the ruling on breastfeeding (rada`ah) applies. `A’ishah and ash-Shafi`i and his companions said that there is no proof for any number less than five. The majority of scholars said that the ruling applies if breastfeeding occurs once. This was narrated by Ibn al-Mundhir from `Ali, Ibn Mas`ud, Ibn `Umar, Ibn `Abbas, `Ata’, Tawus, Ibn al-Musayyib, al-Hasan, Makhul, al-Zuhri, Qatadah, Hammad, Malik, al-Awza`i, al-Thawri and Abu Hanifah (may Allah be pleased with them). Abu Thawr, Abu `Ubayd, Ibn al-Mundhir and Dawud said: The ruling applies in the case of three sessions of breastfeeding, not less than that. Ash-Shafa`i and those who agreed with him followed the hadith of `A’ishah which mentioned five known session of breastfeeding.

Sheikh Ibn Baz was asked whether breastfeeding from a woman three times makes her a mahram.

He replied: this breastfeeding three times does not make her a mahram through breastfeeding. The ruling on becoming amahramthrough breastfeeding only applies if breastfeeding occurs five times or more. Then he quoted the hadith of `A’ishah as evidence. (Source: Fatawa Islamiyyah, 3/326)

Sheikh Ibn `Uthaymeen said:

One session of breastfeeding does not have any effect, rather it must be five sessions of breastfeeding that occur before the child is weaned and before he reaches the age of two. A person does not become the woman’s (foster) child if he breastfeeds once or twice or three or four times. It must also be five known sessions of breastfeeding; if there is some uncertainty as to whether he breastfed four or five times, the principle is that it was four, because every time we are uncertain about numbers, we take the lower number. Based on this, if a woman says, I breastfed this child but I do not know if it was once or twice, or three or four or five times, we say that this child is not her (foster) child, because it has to be five known sessions of breastfeeding without a doubt. (Source: Al-Fatawa al-Jami`ah lil-Mar’ah al-Muslimah, 2/768)”

Abd Allah ibn Abbas (Allah be pleased with him) narrates that the Messenger of Allah (Allah bless him & give him peace) said about Hamza’s daughter: “I am not legally permitted to marry her, as foster relations are treated like blood relations (in marital affairs). She is the daughter of my foster-brother.” (Sahih al-Bukhari, no. 2502)

Therefore, the relationships that are unlawful through blood and lineage will also be unlawful through fosterage. As such, a foster-father (foster mother’s husband), foster-brother, foster-uncle, foster-nephew, etc will all be considered to be a woman’s Mahram, and one will be a Mahram to a foster-mother, foster sister, foster niece, etc.

And Allah knows best.

If any readers have some additional advice for this questioner, feel free to post your comments below.

“(O Allah), Guide us to the straight path; The path of those whom you have favored; Not those with whom you are angry; Nor those who go astray.”

The word “rada” or “rida” stems from the root “radaa” and means sucking milk from mother’s breasts in Arabic. As a noun, it means foster brotherhood and sucking milk.

There are various verses about a child sucking milk from his/her mother or another woman in the Quran: “Prohibited to you (for marriage) are … foster-mothers (who gave you suck), foster-sisters” (an-Nisa, 4:23); “The mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years, if the father desires to complete the term.” (al-Baqara, 2:233); “If ye decide on a foster-mother for your offspring, there is no blame on you” (al-Baqara, 2:233); … if they (women you divorced) suckle your (offspring), give them their recompense: and take mutual counsel together, according to what is just and reasonable. And if ye find yourselves in difficulties, let another woman suckle (the child) on the (father’s) behalf.” (at-Talaq, 65:6); “The Day ye shall see it, every mother giving suck shall forget her suckling” (al-Hajj, 22:2); “So We sent this inspiration to the mother of Moses: “Suckle (thy child), but when thou hast fears about him, cast him into the river, but fear not nor grieve: for We shall restore him to thee, and We shall make him one of Our apostles.” (al-Qasas, 28:7); “And we ordained that he (Moses) refused suck at first…” (al-Qasas, 28:12). 

Islamic jurisprudents agree that mothers should suckle their children according to religion because a mother has to protect her children. However, if a woman does not want to suckle, there are different views on whether she can be forced to suckle or not.

According to the majority of Islamic jurisprudents, it is mandoob (recommended) for a mother to suckle her child. She cannot be forced to suckle as long as there is not an obligation. Feeding children with milk is wajib (obligatory) for fathers. He cannot force his wife to suckle; because, the verse “The mothers shall give suck to their offspring for two whole years, if the father desires to complete the term.” (al-Baqara, 2:233) is only a suggestion. However, if the child refuses to suck milk from any woman other than his/her mother, then it is an exception.

A mother can be forced to suckle her child in the following three situations: 

1.If the child refuses to suck milk from any woman other than his/her mother, the mother suckles her child in order to protect him/her from dying.

2.If a breastfeeding mother cannot be found, she suckles her child in order to save the child’s life.

3.If the child has not got a father to take care of him/her and they cannot afford to pay a breastfeeding mother to suckle the child, woman suckles her child herself.

The father must find a foster mother if the mother avoids suckling their child except for the situations listed above. The breastfeeding mother suckles the child near his/her real mother because the mother has got the right of keeping her child near herself so as to bring him/her up. That right continues until the child becomes about seven years old. The woman has got the right to demand payment for hiring a foster mother via suing if the father of the child does not hire a foster mother.

The father does not have to pay the mother to suckle the child, within marriage or within the period of iddah (the period of waiting for a woman who has divorced) after rij’i talaq (revocable divorce) because in this case, he has to pay alimony to his divorced spouse. The mother cannot be forced to suckle her child after bain talaq (irrevocable divorce). According to a sound view of Hanafis, the mother can demand payment for suckling because the following is stated in a verse: “if they suckle your (offspring), give them their recompense” (at-Talaq, 65:6). This verse is related to divorced women. A foster mother is not held responsible for anything except for suckling and what traditions require. Depending on traditions, the foster mother may need to prepare the child’s food, protect him/her, bath him/her, and wash his/her clothes.

If the child sucks from any women other than his/her own mother, as a baby, foster relationship is established between this child and the woman who suckled the child and the woman’s relatives. Blood related relationship is called “bloodline relationship” and relationship established via marriage is called “marital relationship”. Foster relationship has got the same restrictions with bloodline relationship, except for some specific situations.

The conditions under which foster relationships makes it haram to marry: 

1.The milk must belong to a woman. According to the majority, the conclusion is not affected by whether the woman who suckles is married or single or has not got a husband. Foster relationship is not established via sucking anything other than milk; for instance, impure flux, blood or vomit. A man’s milk or an animal’s milk does not cause foster relationship either.

2.The milk must reach the stomach of the child. Sucking the milk from a breast and drinking it from a jug or glass are the same. If the child takes the breast into his/her mouth but if it is not known whether s/he sucked it or not, relationship is not established because conclusions cannot be based on suspicions. However, according to Malikis, the relationship is considered to be established, acting cautiously. On the other hand, Shafiis and Hanbalis put forward the condition of sucking five times because according to a  narration from Hazrat Aisha, firstly a verse stating “haram is established with ten sucks” was sent down in the Quran, but later it was decreased to five times with another verse sent down later. The Prophet passed away while that verse was being read in the Quran. (see: Darimi, Marriage, 49; Muslim, Rada, 25; Abu Dawud, Marriage 10; Tirmidhi, Rada, 3; Malik, Muwatta, Rada, 18).

According to Shafiis, although the verse which decreased the number of sucks to five was abolished, it is still valid as a judgment. It is like the verse: “If an old man and woman fornicate, stone them.” (see: Ibn Majah, Hudud, 9; Darimi, Hudud, 16; Malik, Muwatta, Hudud, 10).

Ibn al-Humam (death: 861/1457) stated that not only the reading of the verse which decreased the number of sucks to five was abolished but also the judgment of it was abolished. (Ibn al-Humam, Fath al-Qadr, Egypt, 1316/1898, III, 345).

According to Hanafis and Malikis, the amount of the milk sucked does not affect the judgment. The evidence to it is the verse “Prohibited to you (for marriage) are … foster-mothers (who gave you suck) and foster-sisters” (an-Nisa, 4:23) and the hadith “Who is haram because of bloodline relationship is also haram because of foster relationship.” (Bukhari, Shahadah, 7; Muslim, Irada, I). This verse and hadith do not mention an amount or number of sucking.

3.Sucking must be through mouth or nose; because, milk can reach stomach only through those two ways, and nourishment occurs.

According to Hanafis, Shafiis and Hanbalis, relationship is not established if milk goes into urethra, eyes, ears or an open sore.

4.The milk must not be mixed with any other kind of liquids. If milk mixes with another kind of liquid, the one whose amount is more is taken into consideration according to Hanafis and Hanbalis. If milk is more, then foster relationship is established. According to Abu Hanifa, when the milk is mixed, foster relationship is not established no matter how much the milk is. This is because the mixed liquid decreases density of milk. The mixed liquid is considered to be more than the amount of milk.

Imam Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad base the judgment on the one which is more in amount.

If the milk is mixed with another woman’s milk and then given to the child, the judgment is based on the one which is more in amount than the other according to Abu Hanifa and Abu Yusuf. If they are equal, the foster relationship is established with both of women. According to Malikis, Imam Mohammad and Zufar, foster relationship is established with both of women in both cases. Judgment is not affected by whether they are equal or one is more than the other. It is the view that is mostly preferred because the milks are of the same kind. When two things of the same kind come together, there is not superiority of one to another.

Breast milk, which is mixed in “Breast Milk Bank” seen in some countries and regions in our day, needs to be sorted out according to the criteria listed above (al-Kasani, Badayi as-Sanayi, Beirut 1394/1974, IV, 135 ff.; Ibn Qudama, al-Mughni, Cairo 1970, VII, 537 et al.; Ibn Rushd, Bidayatul-Mujtahid, Egypt (n.d..), II, 34 et al.; az-Zukhayli, al-Fiqhul-Islami wa Adillatuh Dimashq (Damascus)1405/1985, VII, 705 ff.).

5.According to the majority, milk must be sucked in the first two years of a baby in order to establish foster relationship because, the following is stated in the verse: “Mothers suckle their offspring for a whole of two years”. That verse which is about bloodline children also covers other children who suck from a woman. Hadith: “Foster relationship is established only within the age of two.” (Bukhari, Marriage, 21).

However, according to Abu Hanifa, the length of sucking time is 30 months. The evidence is this verse: “The carrying of the (child) to his weaning is (a period of) thirty months.” (al-Ahqaf, 46:15). Both pregnancy and weaning last for 30 months.

According to the majority of Islamic jurisprudents, 30 months is the total of two years of sucking period and six months which is the shortest period of pregnancy. As a matter of fact; there are other proofs proving that the period of sucking is two years. As stated in another verse: “And We have enjoined on man (to be good) to his parents: in travail up on travail did his mother bear him, and in years twain was his weaning” (Luqman, 31:14).

It is stated in the Quran that “Prohibited to you (for marriage) are … foster-mothers (who gave you suck), foster-sisters…” (an-Nisa, 4:23). Only two foster-relatives are mentioned in this verse. The general principle on the issue was established with this hadith: “Who is haram because of bloodline relationship is also haram because of foster relationship.” (Bukhari, Shahadah, 7; Muslim, Rada I). In addition to the relationships established through bloodline and marriage, relationship is also established through fostering. However, there are two exceptions to it:

The ones prohibited to each other for marriage are as follows 

1.One’s lineal foster ancestors such as foster mothers, foster grandmothers…

2.One’s lineal foster descendants such as foster-daughter, daughter of foster-son’s and children and grandchildren descending from them.

3.One cannot marry his/her foster-parents’ descendants. One cannot marry his/her foster-siblings born from the same parents, from the same father but different mother or from the same mother but different fathers. It is also prohibited to marry the children and grandchildren descending from them.

4.One cannot marry his/her foster-parents’ immediate sisters and brothers. They are the foster uncles and aunts of the suckled person.

5.One cannot marry his foster-father’s and foster-grandfather’s spouses. Whether there was a sexual intercourse between them or not does not affect this judgment. As a matter of fact, one cannot marry his bloodline (biological) father’s spouse, either.

6.It is prohibited for one to marry his foster-son’s or his foster-grandson’s spouse and it is also prohibited to marry his foster-daughter’s son’s spouse. Whether there was a sexual intercourse between them or not does not affect this judgment. As a matter of fact, one cannot marry his daughters-in-law.

However, according to Hanafis, there are some exceptions:

a. One can marry his foster-brother’s or foster-sister’s mother. However, it is not permissible in bloodline relationship. For instance, if a woman suckles a child and if this woman has got a bloodline (biological) son, this son can marry the mother of that child.

b. One can marry his foster-son’s or foster-daughter’s foster brother/sister. However, it is not permissible in bloodline relationship. For instance, if a woman suckles a child, this woman’s spouse can marry the sister of this child. (see: al-Kasani, ibid, III, 4, 5; al-Maydani, al-Lubab, III, 33; az-Zukhayli, ibid, VII, 138, 139).

In conclusion, this principle can be uttered on the issue: The one who sucked is prohibited to marry to the descendants of the one who suckled him/her. However, except for the upcoming children of the one who sucked, there is not a foster relationship established between his/her other bloodline relatives and foster-mother’s bloodline children and marital relatives. In short, there is not a prohibition of marriage between the foster-child’s bloodline siblings and foster-mother’s bloodline children. This is because they did not suck from the same woman and thus there cannot be anything in common in these children’s biological and physical structures.

Rules about Foster-Relationship: Foster-relationship brings about an absolute prohibition for marriage. Except for the exceptions listed above, if foster-relatives have got married somehow, they must get divorced as soon as this situation is realized. Marriages of such people are invalid according to Abu Yusuf and Imam Muhammad, and immoral according to Abu Hanifa.

Foster-relatives are not strangers to each other. If there is not a risk of mischief, they can look at each other. Though relationship is established because of sucking milk, it does not bear the rights of inheritance, alimony, rejection of evidence, guardianship of property or marriage.

Foster-relationship is limited to the issues described in axioms. It does not bear the same rights as bloodline relationship. For this reason, a foster mother cannot ask for alimony from her foster-son. She cannot be his inheritor and cannot claim custody for him. (Hamdi Donduren, Delilleriyle Islam Hukuku, Istanbul, 1983, p.222).

Foster-Father:

The man who enabled breast milk to be produced in foster-mother and who is married to her is foster-father. By the way, the death of the foster-father or divorce does not change this judgment. Foster-father and other marital relatives are prohibited to the foster-child. All the children who belong to the foster-father biologically are foster-child’s foster-siblings. (Ibn Qudama, al-Mughni, VI, 572; al-Maydani, ibid, III, 32).

Proofs of Foster Relationship:
Foster relationship is proved with either confession or evidence.

Continue reading “Foster Relationship”

Quran and Modern Science ::THE FEMALE HONEYBEE’S ABDOMEN AND THE HEALING POWER OF HONEY

69- Then eat from all the fruits and flit about the spacious
paths of your Lord. There issues from within her abdomens
a drink of varying colors, wherein is healing for the people.
Verily in this is a sign for those who understand.
16-The Honeybee, 69
The honeybee has a body that varies in length between 1cm and 3cm,
and that is divided into three parts: head, thorax and abdomen. The
verse quoted above stresses that in the individual female bee there are
“abdomens,” which in Arabic is “butuniha,” the “ha” referring to a
singular female bee. If the plural of the word “abdomen” was meant
to refer to the female bees, then the plural female pronoun “hunna”
would be attached to the verb “butuniha.” This makes clear the segmented abdomen of the bee. Inside the abdomen there are two stomachs or crops. When collecting the nectar from flowers, nectar is
stored in this honey stomach for transport back to the hive. At the rear
of the honey stomach is a valve that prevents stored nectar from passing on into the rear portion of the digestive system, except for the
small amount needed by the bee to sustain life. The hind portion of
the bee’s body is the abdomen that is made up of segments in the
form of rings. The abdomen of the bee functions as a chemistry laboratory to produce honey.
The colors of honey vary as stated in the Quran. They change
according to the climate, season and weather conditions and the
sources where nectar is obtained. The color of honey ranges from dark brown to green, among which the light yellow is preferred. In the
honey industry, modern countries with developed techniques use a
colorimeter to establish the exact description of honey’s color.
THE HONEY DANCES OF BEES
At the beginning of the verse, reference is made to the collection of
nectar. The female bees not only produce honey, but also assume the
duty of collecting the raw material from flowers to be eventually transformed into honey. During this process of seeking the nectar, incredible phenomena occur.
The bee that has located the spot where there is nectar to be collected returns to the hive to inform her sisters about the location of
flowers. The scout bees returning to the hive perform circular dances
or tail-wagging movements on the comb. These dances indicate not
only that the scouts have found nectar or pollen and that the other
workers should go out and seek it, but they are actually performing an
amazing charade that conveys precise information to their sisters
about the direction and the distance of the location of a newfound
source.
Sometimes a normal adult must attend a dance course for six weeks
while a bee, whose lifetime is but six weeks, is able to perform a dance
for communication purposes. The bee’s calculation on her way back to
the hive is also of great interest. The bee makes her calculation according to the position of the sun. The sun changes its locality one degree
per four minutes. The bee that has spotted the location of her food also
calculates her return journey as directly and correctly as possible in relation to the sun. She performs this without any error. All these calculations and harmonious coexistence within the hive cannot possibly be
explained by pure coincidence or after a six-week-long training. So, all
these are innate in her as an endowment of the Creator.
THE HEALING POWER OF HONEY
The verse speaks of the nutritive property of honey, a product of
female bees. The regenerative property of honey is confirmed by medical authorities. In addition to its rich vitamin content, among its components are also such minerals such as calcium, potassium, magnesium, sodium, phosphorus as well as such metals as copper, iodine,
iron, zinc, and hormones.
Thanks to the easy convertibility of its sugar content, it is easily
assimilated. Honey facilitates the functioning of the brain, thanks to
its other sugars. It contributes to the production of blood, to its
cleansing and proper circulation. Honey provides for the requirement
necessary for proper functioning of our physiology and also it is used
externally in cosmetics and dermatology.
The fact that honey had healing properties was nothing new for
communities all over the world. Therefore, I am not claiming that this
was not a generally acknowledged fact at the time of the descent of
the Quran. However there were also such superstitious beliefs as the
healing effect of a camel’s urine, which was later falsely attributed to
the Prophet in hadith books. The Quran never justifies any of such
false ideas offered as elixirs. Had the Quran been a product of human
imagination, it might also have contained at least a residue of such
false beliefs.
The distribution of work of bees in a hive and the multiple tasks
performed by bees is too complicated to explain within the scope of
this book. The ventilation of the hive, regulating humidity and temperature, keeping a perfect hygienic medium in the hive; guarding the
hive, discarding the unwanted foreign matter, dead bees, etc., secreting wax, propolis, all are amazing tasks. How can a bee, whose lifetime is but six weeks, know and perform such grandiose artistry?
Without an intelligent Creator the fortuity of all these data is certainly unimaginable. Every inquirer into the doings of a bee – to whose
properties there are references in the Quran – will observe the sublime
artistry of God in the entity of an insect.
4- Also in your creation and spreading of the animals are
signs for people of assured faith.
45-Kneeling, 4

Chapter 6 on Sayyidina Rasulullah Sallalhu’Alayhi Wasallam using a dye

WhatsApp Image 2021-05-18 at 7.31.33 PM

There are many different ahaadith on this subject. From among these Imaam Tirmidhi had mentioned four ahaadith in this chapter. Because of the different ahaadith on this subject, the ‘ulema have also differed as to whether Sayyidina Rasulullah Salallahu’Alayhi Wassalam dyed his hair or not. Imaam Tirmidhi and the majority are of the opinion that he did not dye his hair. The Hanafis also hold the same view. It is stated in the ‘Durri Mukhtaar| that it is more correct that Sayyidina Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wassalam did not dye his hair. ‘Allamah Shaami has reasoned that according to Bukhari and other muhadditheen, Sayyidina Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasalam did not have more than seventeen white hair in his mubaarak beard and head. Bayjuri As-Shaafi’ee, the commentator on the Shamaa-il Tirmidhi is of the opinion that Sayyidina Rasullah Sallallahy ‘Alayhi Wasallam sometimes dyed his hair bou did not do so regularly.
MAS-ALAH: According to the Hanafi ‘ulema, dying of the hair is mustahab but according to a well known saying the using of a black dye is makruh. The Shafi’ee ‘ulema say that the use of a dye is sunnah, and the use of black dye is haraam.

(44) Hadith Number 1
Abu Rimthah Taymi Radhiallahu ‘Anhu says: “I attended a gathering of Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam with my son. Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam asked me, ‘Is this your son?’ I replied: ‘Yes, this is my son. You be a witness to it.’ Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alahi Wasallam said: ‘The revenge of his crime (jinayah) is not on you, nor is the revenge of your crime on him.’ (This will be explained in the commentary). Abu Rimthah Radhiallahu ‘Anhu says: ‘At that time I noticed a few hair of Rasulullah Salallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam were red.” Imam Tirmidhi says: ‘This hadith is the most correct and closest on the subject of using a dye.’

Commentary
It was the custom in the pre-Islamic times (jaahiliyah) that a son was punished for the crimes of his father. On this basis Abu Rimthah Radhiallahy ‘Anhu said this, so that if it would be necessary at any time, Sayyidina Rasulullah Sallallhu ‘Alayhi Wasallam would be witness that truly this was his son. Sayyidin Rasullulah Sallallhu ‘Alayhi Wasallam in refuting this custom of the jaahiliyyah said: ‘This is not the law of Islaam, that one person commits a crime and another gets punished for it.” (No laden soul can bear anothers load.-Surah Najm,38).
back

(45) Hadith Number 2
Abu Hurairah Radhiallahu ‘Anhu was asked: “Did Rasulullah Sallallhu ‘Alayhi Wasallam use a dye?” (for his hair). He replied: “Yes.”

(46) Hadith Number 3
Jah-dhamah Radiallahu ‘Anha, the wife of Bashir Kha-saasiyyah Radiallahu ‘Anhu says: “I saw Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam coming out of the house after taking a bath and was stroking (or combing) his haif. There were signs of henna on his mubaarak head.”

(47) Hadith Number 4
Anas Radhiallahu ‘Anhu says: “I saw that the hair of Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam had been dyed.”

Commentary
As has been explained there are different narrations on the dying of the hair of Sayyidina Rasulullahu Sallallahu ‘Alayhi Wasallam. There is an apparent contradiction between this narration and the one mentioned in the first hadith of the previous chapter, where Sayyidina Anas Radiyallahu ‘Anhu denies Sayyidina Rasulullah Sallallahu ‘ Alayhi Wasallam used a dye. we may take both narrations to be correct, as they could have been narrated at an earlier and a later period.

The Last Ottoman Gaurdian in Jerusalem

Hasan-Igdirli-750x432Corporal Hasan belonged to the 20th corp, 36th Battalion, 8th Squadron. He was one of the rearguard troops left in Jerusalem that the Ottoman Army used to prevent pillage and maintain order and safety. According to tradition, the victor of the war never treats rearguard troops as war captives in a captured city. 

When British troops entered Jerusalem, they wanted a small force to stay in the city to avoid a potential negative public reaction after entering the holy city of Jerusalem.

Until 1972, 47 years ago, when the late Turkish journalist Ilhan Bardakci accompanied Turkish officials and businessmen on a courtesy visit to Israel, nobody in the Turkish public had heard of Corporal Hasan.

Bardakci says the trip was like any other until the fourth day where he witnessed an emotional moment in Quds (Jerusalem in Arabic).

“Because on the fourth day of the visit, they [Israeli officials] led us around in historical and touristic places and we arrived at Al Aqsa Mosque in the cortege. I felt thrilled while climbing to the upstairs of the sacred mosque. They call the upstairs courtyard ‘12,000 chandelier courtyard’ where Yavuz Sultan Selim lit 12,000 candles in chandeliers. The magnificent Ottoman Army performed isha prayer by candlelight, the name refers to it.”

Then, he saw a man over 90 years old in the courtyard of Al Aqsa Mosque, who drew Bardakci’s attention. 

Bardakci asked the foreign affairs official who was standing near him in the courtyard of the mosque. The official replied saying: “I don’t know, maybe just an insane man who just stands here, never asks anything to anyone, never looks to anyone.”

Bardakci was not satisfied with that answer and said, “I was old enough to know that no one would glower at a courtyard without a good reason. What I couldn’t get was that if his shimmering white beard was because of the breeze or the heavy burden of the years.”

He was not sure about whether he should speak to him. He realised that while he was getting closer, the old man did not move. Then, Bardakci approached the old man and said “As-Salaam-Alaikum father”. The old man hesitantly replied to him saying “Wa Alaykum As-Salam, son.”

In a reply to Bardakci’s question about what he was doing there, the old man replied: “I am Corporal Hasan from the 20th corp, 36th Battalion, 8th Squadron heavy machine gun team.” 

He continued like a soldier giving a brief: “Our troops raided the British on Suez Canal front in the Great War. Our glorious army was defeated at the Canal. To withdraw was requisite now. The heirloom lands of our ancestors were about to be lost one by one. And then, the Brits pressed upon the gates of Quds, occupied the city. We were left as rearguard troops at Quds.”

“My rearguard troop consisted of 53 privates. We got the news that after truce [Mondros Armistice] the army was discharged. Our lieutenant was leading to us, he said ‘My lions, our country is in an arduous situation. They are discharging our glorious army and calling me to Istanbul. I have to go, if I don’t I’d be in defiance of authority, fail to obey the order. Anyone can return to the homeland if he wills, but if you follow my words, I have a request from you: Quds is an heirloom of Sultan Selim Han. Remain on guard duty here. Don’t let the people worry about “Ottomans have left; what we are going to do now.”’ The Westerners will exult if Ottomans left the first qibla [direction to face while praying] of our beloved prophet. Don’t let the honour of Islam and the glory of Ottomans be trampled on.”

He continued: “Our troop stayed in Quds. And, almost suddenly the long years vanished. My brothers from the troop passed away one by one. We weren’t mowed down by the enemy, but the years. Only I am left here. Just me, a corporal Hasan in the grand Quds.”

He asked Bardakci a favour: “When you arrive in Anatolia, if you pass towards Tokat Sanjak, please visit my commander Lieutenant Mustafa, the man who deployed me to guard Al-Aqsa Mosque and trusted these sacred places to me. Kiss his hands for me and tell him: ‘Corporal Hasan from Igdir Province of the 11th Machine gun team still remains at Quds as you deployed him to… He didn’t abandon his duty and wishes your blessings, commander’.”

Bardakci agreed while holding back tears. He grabbed Corporal Hasan’s callused hands and kissed, again and again, he said: “Goodbye father.”
Hasan thanked him, saying he knows it is impossible to see Turkey before death arrives. 

When Bardakci returned to Turkey, he went to Tokat to honour his words and traced Hasan’s commander Lieutenant Mustafa Efendi through military records. However, the commander had already passed years ago. Bardakci was not able to keep his promise to Corporal Hasan. 

In 1982, Bardakci held a telegraph in his hands with the message: “The last Ottoman guardian at Al Aqsa Mosque has passed away today. “